摘要：The International Political Science Association (IPSA) is a unique case against the common perception that Beijing has the upper hand when the two regimes by the Taiwan Strait contest to join international (non-governmental) organisations. Beijing relentlessly pushes international organisations to acknowledge the One China principle; Taipei also relentlessly denies this principle while it seeks to join. In the 1980s, Chinese and Taiwanese political scientists, representing their own regimes, applied Track II diplomacy to compete over membership of this organisation. IPSA membership mattered to both regimes and their political scientists. After many years of Track II competition, The Chinese Association of Political Science in Taipei became a "collective" member without compromising on how to name itself in April 1989. As a result, Beijing's counterpart withdrew from the IPSA. This situation has now persisted for over thirty years. The IPSA case not only challenges the current understanding of Cross-Strait relations but also throws light on the theoretical understanding of Track II diplomacy.

該文於(yu) 2024年5月發表於(yu) A&HCI期刊《International Journal of Asian Studies》。

原文鏈接地址：https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-asian-studies/article/political-scientists-track-ii-diplomacy-the-international-political-science-association-and-crossstrait-relations/1C9AF4B720629C9057DA576A1A17844B。